Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and the Earth Day Network found that Americans are willing to ditch meat if they knew the cost to the planet.

Americans’ willingness to change their diets to help the environment depends in part on their concerns about climate change and their incomes.

Unfortunately, many Americans don’t know how what they eat contributes to the climate change that is causing extreme weather events such as stronger hurricanes, more intense floods, increased drought and larger, hotter wildfires, found researchers from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and the Earth Day Network.

More than half of Americans surveyed said they would be willing to eat more plant-based proteins or less red meat, and nearly half said they would consumer dairy alternatives. But they are concerned about the cost and taste of those foods, as well as their ability to conveniently purchase them.

The modern food system generates as much as 30{85424e366b324f7465dc80d56c21055464082cc00b76c51558805a981c8fcd63} of the greenhouse gases causing global warming, but if more Americans changed to plant-based diets, those emissions would decrease. Livestock production is the leading agricultural contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, while fruits and vegetables create the lowest levels, according to a 2018 study cited in the Yale report.

These results show that American consumers need more information about the effects of their diet on global warming, as well as lessons on what plant-based foods to purchase and how to cook them. Natural products brands and retailers have a tremendous opportunity to educate consumers on these issues.


The report is based on a survey conducted by the Yale program and Earth Day Network. Researchers interviewed 1,043 adults from Dec. 6 through 11. Demographics were weighted to reflect U.S. Census Bureau norms, according to the researchers. Of all respondents, 48{85424e366b324f7465dc80d56c21055464082cc00b76c51558805a981c8fcd63} were men. By generation, 33{85424e366b324f7465dc80d56c21055464082cc00b76c51558805a981c8fcd63} were baby boomers (55-73); 25{85424e366b324f7465dc80d56c21055464082cc00b76c51558805a981c8fcd63} were Gen-Xers (39-54); 30{85424e366b324f7465dc80d56c21055464082cc00b76c51558805a981c8fcd63} were millennials (23-38); 7{85424e366b324f7465dc80d56c21055464082cc00b76c51558805a981c8fcd63} were 74 or older; and 5{85424e366b324f7465dc80d56c21055464082cc00b76c51558805a981c8fcd63} were Generation Z (18-22).

Some results were broken down by respondents’ income categories – below $50,000 a year; between $50,000 and $99,999; and $100,000 or above. But that “low income” category is broader than what many would regard as low income. The federal poverty level for a family of four in 2020 is $26,200. Someone working a full-time, minimum-wage job would not make that much in a year unless they worked in Washington state, the District of Columbia or New York City, New York, which have minimum wages of $13.50, $14 and $15 per hour, respectively, according to the federal Department of Labor. Minimum wages of between $12 and $13 per hour—$24,960-$27,040 annually—are the law in Arizona, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts and California (for small businesses only). The federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour – $15,080 a year – prevails in 21 states.

The study’s principal investigators were Anthony Leiserowitz, director of the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and a senior research scientist at the School of Forestry & Environmental Studies at Yale University; Matthew Ballew, a postdoctoral associate who specializes in social psychology and survey research; Seth Rosenthal, the project director who focuses on survey methodology at the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication; and Jillian Semaan, director of Food and Environment for Earth Day Network. Earth Day Network funded the study as part of its 50th anniversary of Earth Day commemoration.

Original source: https://www.newhope.com